Friday, October 4, 2013

Assignment #2: Foul-Mouthed Hacker Hijacks Baby's Monitor (Ryan Puglisi)

This article outlines how a family was harassed when a hacker was able to gain access to their baby monitor. Once he gained access, he was able to find out the child’s name by swiveling the webcam; he then started to harass the child. The family discovered the actions of the hacker when they heard a strange voice coming from their child’s room. Once the family discovered tampering the hacker directed his harassment toward them as well. In order to stop the onslaught, the family’s only choice was to cease using the baby monitor. Fortunately, the daughter was deaf and had her cochlear implant removed while sleeping, so she didn’t hear the hacker’s offensive tirade.


Unless this man is truly atypical and regularly invades homes to harass children in his day-to-day activities, his actions outlined in the article are an apt portrayal of the online disinhibition effect (a very toxic inhibition)—acting online in a manner that a person would not otherwise do in the real-world. Specifically, the hacker is demonstrating dissociative anonymity. The hacker, which the family describes to have had a “European or British accent,” could have been acting on people thousands of miles away, who have no possible connection or apparent way of tracking the hacker’s identity. Thus, the hacker felt completely separated from his actions upon the family. For all we know, this man could have been a preschool teacher or a Member of British parliament who gets his kicks on the weekend anonymously harassing babies.  Any restraint his superego imposed on his real life actions were not in play when he shouted expletives at a baby. The motivation for this invasion of privacy and harassment seems to be simple ‘blind catharsis.’

No comments:

Post a Comment